International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (IJECRT)
Aims & Scope
International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (IJECRT) informs researchers, developers, managers, strategic planners, users, and others interested in state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice activities in the Engineering Computational Research and Technology areas.
The Journal is issued in electronic form as two issues per year. The articles in this journal are peer reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth in the IJECRT paper submission guidelines. Each published article was reviewed by a minimum of two independent reviewers using a single-blind peer review process, where the identities of the reviewers are not known to the authors, but the reviewers know the identities of the authors. Articles will be screened for plagiarism before acceptance.
An author is a person who has a substantial contribution to the article; all other contributions should be mentioned as acknowledgments. Authors should cite only the articles which have contributed to their work; unnecessary citations should not be listed. Authors should present their work as objectively as possible. Arguments that discriminate people by race, sex, origin, religion, etc are not accepted. Bogus results must not be given. Reviewers should not take advantages from the manuscript; instead, they should help the authors to improve their work. Reviewers should not criticize in public the manuscripts. The Editor guarantees the anonymity of the reviewer.
The IJECRT operates a single blind review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor – in – chief for suitability for the journal. Papers which are suitable, sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The reviewer can be member of the IJECRT editorial board or an expert from the worldwide scientific community. The review period depends from the research topic of the manuscript and the availability of the reviewers. An average review process period is between 1 and 4 months. In general the reviewers check the importance of the article in the scientific community, if it is easy to read it and the validity of the scientific content. An article can be rejected from the reviewers due lack of poor language quality, lack of proper structure, lack of new scientific ideas, lack of clear concepts or conclusions. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles.